Genre: Meta-politics.
Goal: Depersonalizing debate at every scale.
Goal: Depersonalizing debate at every scale.
Credence Level: 90%
Novelty Level: Moderate. I've made noises about this before, but have never truly expanded on my points in the glorious ways I have here.
Priority Level: High. Somewhere in the "things I'm very concerned with and you should be too" stack.
Alt-goal: Improving relations (if any) between pragmatists and pessimists.
Disclaimer: Due to the breadth of this topic and its associated drifts, I have decided to split things. This post is part one of a three part series. The split resembles my Q&A post from 2018, except this time around, the second and third installments will actually be finished and posted sooner than later (the Q&A drafts are on life support, unsure if I'll be reviving them down the road).
